<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open in New Window</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randomfrequency.net/blog/2004/12/20/open-in-new-window/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randomfrequency.net/blog/2004/12/20/open-in-new-window/</link>
	<description>where the signal to noise ratio always varies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:54:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://randomfrequency.net/blog/2004/12/20/open-in-new-window/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomfrequency.net/archives/2004/12/20/open-in-new-window/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>People have become very accustomed to using the &quot;back&quot; button on their browser, much more so than I think many people would expect. People will often use the &quot;back&quot; button over a site&#039;s built-in navigation, when possible. If someone wants to come back to your site, they will use that back button. That&#039;s what a person naturally does when they want to go back to a site anyway. If the user is so lacking in computer skills, having that window open unexpectedly is probably doing more harm than good. (That&#039;s assuming they even notice that a new window has opened. If they haven&#039;t, they&#039;re in for a real treat when they try to use the back button. They&#039;re also in for a surprise when they get done browsing and go to close their browser, only to find a bunch of windows still open.) And if a person actually wants to deal with multiple windows, they can easily open the link in new windows.

I also think it&#039;s absurd to assume that anytime a person clicks on a link, they&#039;re going to &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to return to the page they clicked from. While this is frequently the case, it is also frequently not the case. Often, when clicking a link, I really do want to leave a site completely.

Your note about Firefox is nice, but isn&#039;t helpful when I&#039;m using a public terminal. I really wish they&#039;d all have Firefox, but far too often they&#039;re limited to just IE. Either way, I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to say that, because Firefox can disable it, it&#039;s okay to do it. A website shouldn&#039;t be making my windowing/tabbing decisions for me to begin with; having Firefox disable that is nice, but it&#039;s fixing bad website behavior, not justifying it. (By the way, you can also completely disable the new window behavior instead of making them tabs.)

Anyhow, like I&#039;ve said elsewhere: to each his or her own. The behavior obviously isn&#039;t going to stop anytime soon. I just wish it would, because it wouldn&#039;t require much for users to adapt to and it would make the web a lot more user-friendly. (And if people really want all their non-local links to spawn new windows, an extension for Firefox could easily be developed to do that, I&#039;m sure. That way only the people who WANT that feature would have to put up with it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have become very accustomed to using the &#8220;back&#8221; button on their browser, much more so than I think many people would expect. People will often use the &#8220;back&#8221; button over a site&#8217;s built-in navigation, when possible. If someone wants to come back to your site, they will use that back button. That&#8217;s what a person naturally does when they want to go back to a site anyway. If the user is so lacking in computer skills, having that window open unexpectedly is probably doing more harm than good. (That&#8217;s assuming they even notice that a new window has opened. If they haven&#8217;t, they&#8217;re in for a real treat when they try to use the back button. They&#8217;re also in for a surprise when they get done browsing and go to close their browser, only to find a bunch of windows still open.) And if a person actually wants to deal with multiple windows, they can easily open the link in new windows.</p>
<p>I also think it&#8217;s absurd to assume that anytime a person clicks on a link, they&#8217;re going to <em>want</em> to return to the page they clicked from. While this is frequently the case, it is also frequently not the case. Often, when clicking a link, I really do want to leave a site completely.</p>
<p>Your note about Firefox is nice, but isn&#8217;t helpful when I&#8217;m using a public terminal. I really wish they&#8217;d all have Firefox, but far too often they&#8217;re limited to just IE. Either way, I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to say that, because Firefox can disable it, it&#8217;s okay to do it. A website shouldn&#8217;t be making my windowing/tabbing decisions for me to begin with; having Firefox disable that is nice, but it&#8217;s fixing bad website behavior, not justifying it. (By the way, you can also completely disable the new window behavior instead of making them tabs.)</p>
<p>Anyhow, like I&#8217;ve said elsewhere: to each his or her own. The behavior obviously isn&#8217;t going to stop anytime soon. I just wish it would, because it wouldn&#8217;t require much for users to adapt to and it would make the web a lot more user-friendly. (And if people really want all their non-local links to spawn new windows, an extension for Firefox could easily be developed to do that, I&#8217;m sure. That way only the people who WANT that feature would have to put up with it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://randomfrequency.net/blog/2004/12/20/open-in-new-window/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomfrequency.net/archives/2004/12/20/open-in-new-window/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I think that having the link open in a new tab is ok.  Some people are not computer literate...in fact most aren&#039;t, and this makes it easier for them to stay on the site that offers the links.  If people would just use a decent browser like Firefox, then there wouldn&#039;t be all the griping about this particular issue.  I tend to use target=&quot;_blank&quot; in almost all links, which opens the link in a new tab in firefox.  IE still opens a new window since it&#039;s so brain dead.

I create sites for the person who knows little to nothing about computers.  If you don&#039;t like the current open window...there&#039;s always the x to close it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that having the link open in a new tab is ok.  Some people are not computer literate&#8230;in fact most aren&#8217;t, and this makes it easier for them to stay on the site that offers the links.  If people would just use a decent browser like Firefox, then there wouldn&#8217;t be all the griping about this particular issue.  I tend to use target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; in almost all links, which opens the link in a new tab in firefox.  IE still opens a new window since it&#8217;s so brain dead.</p>
<p>I create sites for the person who knows little to nothing about computers.  If you don&#8217;t like the current open window&#8230;there&#8217;s always the x to close it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

